Journal cover Journal topic
Annales Geophysicae An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 1.585 IF 1.585
  • IF 5-year value: 1.698 IF 5-year
    1.698
  • CiteScore value: 1.62 CiteScore
    1.62
  • SNIP value: 0.820 SNIP 0.820
  • IPP value: 1.52 IPP 1.52
  • SJR value: 0.781 SJR 0.781
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 83 Scimago H
    index 83
  • h5-index value: 24 h5-index 24
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2019-120
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2019-120
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Submitted as: regular paper 23 Aug 2019

Submitted as: regular paper | 23 Aug 2019

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO).

Impact of local gravity wave forcing in the lower stratosphere on the polar vortex stability: Effect of longitudinal displacement

Nadja Samtleben1, Aleš Kuchař2, Petr Šácha2,3,4, Petr Pišoft2, and Christoph Jacobi1 Nadja Samtleben et al.
  • 1Institute for Meteorology, Universität Leipzig, Stephanstr. 3, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
  • 2Department of Atmospheric Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, V Holesovickach 2, 180 00 Prague 8, Czech Republic
  • 3Institute for Meteorology, Universität für Bodenkultur Wien, Gregor-Mendel-Straße 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria
  • 4EPhysLab, Faculty of Sciences, Universidade de Vigo, Campus As Lagoas, s/n, 32004 Ourense, Spain

Abstract. The effects of gravity wave (GW) breaking hotspots in the lower stratosphere, especially the role of their longitudinal distribution, are evaluated through a sensitivity study by using a simplified middle atmosphere circulation model. For the position of the local GW hotspot, we first selected a fixed latitude range between 37.5 and 62.5° N and a longitude range from 112.5 to 168.75° E, as well as an altitude range between 18 and 30 km. This confined GW hotspot was then shifted in longitude by 45° steps, so that we created 8 artificial GW hotspots in total. Strongly depending on the location of the respective GW hotspot with regard to the phase of the stationary planetary wave of wavenumber 1 (SPW 1) generated in the model, the local GW forcing may interfere constructively or destructively with the modeled SPW 1. GW hotspots, which are located in North America near the Rocky Mountains lead to an increase of the SPW 1 amplitude and EP flux, while hotspots located near the Caucasus, the Himalayas or the Scandinavian region lead to a decrease of these parameters. Thus, the polar vortex is less (Caucasus and Himalayan hotspots) or more weakened (Rocky Mountains hotspot) by the prevailing SPW activity. Because the local GW forcing generally suppresses wave propagation at midlatitudes, the SPWs 1 are propagating into the polar region, where the refractive index turned to positive values for the majority of the artificial GW hotspots. An additional source of SPW 1 may be local instabilities indicated by the reversal in the meridional potential vorticity gradient in the polar region in connection with a positive EP divergence. In most cases, the SPWs 1 are breaking in the polar region and maintain the deceleration and thus, the weakening of the polar vortex. While the SPWs 1 that form when the GW hotspots are located above North America propagate through the polar region into the middle atmosphere, the SPWs 1 in the remaining GW hotspot simulations were not able to propagate further upwards because of a negative refractive index above the positive refractive index anomaly in the polar region. GW hotspots, which are located near the Himalayas influence the mesosphere/lower thermosphere region because of possible local instabilities in the lower mesosphere generating additional SPWs 1, which propagate upwards into the mesosphere.

Nadja Samtleben et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: open (until 23 Oct 2019)
Status: open (until 23 Oct 2019)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Nadja Samtleben et al.
Nadja Samtleben et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 99 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
77 22 0 99 1 1
  • HTML: 77
  • PDF: 22
  • XML: 0
  • Total: 99
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Aug 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Aug 2019)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 94 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 93 with geography defined and 1 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 19 Sep 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
The additional transfer of momentum and energy induced by locally breaking gravity wave hotspots in the lower stratosphere may lead to a destabilization of the polar vortex, which is strongly depending on the position of the hotspot. The simulations with a global circulation model show that hotspots located above Eurasia cause a total decrease in the stationary planetary wave (SPW) activity, while the impact of hotspots located in North America mostly increase the SPW activity.
The additional transfer of momentum and energy induced by locally breaking gravity wave hotspots...
Citation