Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 1.621 IF 1.621
  • IF 5-year value: 1.614 IF 5-year 1.614
  • CiteScore value: 1.61 CiteScore 1.61
  • SNIP value: 0.900 SNIP 0.900
  • SJR value: 0.910 SJR 0.910
  • IPP value: 1.58 IPP 1.58
  • h5-index value: 24 h5-index 24
  • Scimago H index value: 80 Scimago H index 80
Discussion papers | Copyright
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2018-42
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ANGEO Communicates 14 May 2018

ANGEO Communicates | 14 May 2018

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. A revision of the manuscript is under review for the journal Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO).

A new method to identify flux ropes in space plasmas

Shiyong Huang1, Pufan Zhao1, Jiansen He2, Zhigang Yuan1, Meng Zhou3, Huishan Fu4, Xiaohua Deng3, Ye Pang3, Dedong Wang1, Xiongdong Yu1, Haimeng Li4, Roy Torbert5, and James Burch6 Shiyong Huang et al.
  • 1School of Electronic Information, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
  • 2School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
  • 3Institute of Space Science and Technology, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
  • 4School of Space and Environment, Beihang University, Beijing, China
  • 5University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, USA
  • 6Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio TX, USA

Abstract. Flux ropes are frequently observed in the space plasmas, such as magnetosphere, magnetosheath, and solar wind etc., and play an important role in the reconnection process and mass and flux transportation. One usually used bipolar signature and strong core field to identify the flux ropes. We propose here one new method to identify flux ropes based on the correlations between the variables of the data from in-situ spacecraft observations and the target-function-to-be-correlated (TFC) from the ideal flux rope model. Through comparing the correlation coefficients of different variables at different time and scales, and performing weighted average technique, this method can derive the scales and locations of the flux ropes. We discuss the limitation of our method and also compare it with other methods.

Download & links
Shiyong Huang et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: final response (author comments only)
Status: final response (author comments only)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Login for Authors/Topical Editors] [Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Shiyong Huang et al.
Shiyong Huang et al.
Viewed
Total article views: 439 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
356 76 7 439 5 5
  • HTML: 356
  • PDF: 76
  • XML: 7
  • Total: 439
  • BibTeX: 5
  • EndNote: 5
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 May 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 14 May 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 439 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 436 with geography defined and 3 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited
Saved
No saved metrics found.
Discussed
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 19 Aug 2018
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Share