Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 1.621 IF 1.621
  • IF 5-year value: 1.614 IF 5-year 1.614
  • CiteScore value: 1.61 CiteScore 1.61
  • SNIP value: 0.900 SNIP 0.900
  • SJR value: 0.910 SJR 0.910
  • IPP value: 1.58 IPP 1.58
  • h5-index value: 24 h5-index 24
  • Scimago H index value: 80 Scimago H index 80
Discussion papers | Copyright
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2018-31
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Regular paper 25 Apr 2018

Regular paper | 25 Apr 2018

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO).

Dynamics of the electrojet during intense magnetic disturbances

Liudmila I. Gromova1, Matthias Förster2,3, Iakov I. Feldstein1, and Patricia Ritter2 Liudmila I. Gromova et al.
  • 1Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere, and Radiowave Propagation of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IZMIRAN), 142090 Troitsk, Moscow region, Russia
  • 2Helmholtz-Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
  • 3Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, 37077 Göttingen, Germany

Abstract. Hall current variations in different time sectors during six magnetic storms of the summer seasons in 2003 and 2005 are examined in detail: three storms in the day-night meridional sector and three storms in the dawn-dusk sector. We investigate the sequence of the phenomena, their structure, positions and the density of the polar (PE) and the auroral (AE) Hall electrojets using scalar magnetic field measurements obtained from the CHAMP satellite in accordance with the study of Ritter et al. (2004a). Particular attention is devoted to the spatial-temporal behaviour of the PE at ionospheric altitudes during daytime hours both under geomagnetically quiet and under magnetic storm conditions. We analyze the correlations of the PE and AE with various activity indices like SYM/H and ASYM/H, that stand for large-scale current systems in the magnetosphere, AL for ionospheric currents, and the IndN coupling function for the state of the solar wind. We obtain regression relations of the magnetic latitude MLat and the electrojet current density I with those indices and with the interplanetary By and Bz magnetic field components. For the geomagnetic storms during summer seasons investigated here, we obtain the following typical characteristics for the electrojets' dynamics:

1. The PE appears at magnetic latitudes (MLat) and local times (MLT) of the cusp position.
2. This occurs in the day-time sector at MLat ∼73°–80° with a westward or an eastward direction, depending on the orientation of the IMF By component. Changes of current flow direction in the PE can occur repeatedly during the storm, but only due to changes of the IMF By orientation.
3. The current density in the PE increases with the intensity of the IMF By component from I0.4A/m for By0nT up to I1.0A/m for By23nT.
4. The MLat position of the PE does not depend on the orientation and the strength of the IMF By component. It depends, however, on the strength of the IMF Bz component.
5. The PE is situated at MLat73° on the dayside during geomagnetically quiet periods and the recovery phase of a magnetic storm, and it shifts equatorward during intense substorms and the main phase of a storm.
6. There is no connection between MLat and the current density I in the PE with the magnetospheric ring current DR (index SYM/H).
7. There is a correlation between the current density I in the PE and the partial ring current in the magnetosphere (PRC, index ASYM/H), but practically no correlation of this index with MLat of the PE.
8. Substorms that occur before and during the beginning of a storm main phase are accompanied in the daytime by the appearance of an eastward electrojet (EE) at MLat64° and then also by a westward electrojet (WE). In the nighttime sector the WE appears at MLat64°.
9. During the development of the main storm phase, the daytime EE and the nighttime WE shift toward subauroral latitudes of MLat56° and intensify up to I1.5A/m. Both electrojets persist during the main phase of the storm. The WE is then located about 6° closer to the pole than the EE during evening hours and about 2°–3° during daytime hours.

Download & links
Liudmila I. Gromova et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: final response (author comments only)
Status: final response (author comments only)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Login for Authors/Topical Editors] [Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Liudmila I. Gromova et al.
Liudmila I. Gromova et al.
Viewed
Total article views: 328 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
269 52 7 328 4 6
  • HTML: 269
  • PDF: 52
  • XML: 7
  • Total: 328
  • BibTeX: 4
  • EndNote: 6
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Apr 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Apr 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 328 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 326 with geography defined and 2 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited
Saved
No saved metrics found.
Discussed
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 19 Aug 2018
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Share