Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 1.621 IF 1.621
  • IF 5-year value: 1.614 IF 5-year 1.614
  • CiteScore value: 1.61 CiteScore 1.61
  • SNIP value: 0.900 SNIP 0.900
  • SJR value: 0.910 SJR 0.910
  • IPP value: 1.58 IPP 1.58
  • h5-index value: 24 h5-index 24
  • Scimago H index value: 80 Scimago H index 80
Discussion papers | Copyright
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2018-11
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Regular paper 16 Feb 2018

Regular paper | 16 Feb 2018

Monitoring potential ionosphere changes caused by Van earthquake (Mw 7.2) using GNSS measurements

Selcuk Peker1, Samed Inyurt2, and Cetin Mekik2 Selcuk Peker et al.
  • 1General Command of Mapping, Ankara, Turkey
  • 2Bulent Ecevit University, Geomatics Engineering Department, Zonguldak

Abstract. Several scientists from different disciplines have studied earthquakes for many years. As a result of these studies, it has been proposed that some changes take place in the ionosphere layer before, during or after earthquakes, and the ionosphere should be monitored in earthquake prediction studies. This study investigates the changes in the ionosphere created by the earthquake with magnitude of Mw=7.2 in the northwest of the Lake Erçek which is located to the north of the province of Van in Turkey on 23 October 2011 and at 1.41pm local time (−3UT) with the epicenter of 38.758°N, 43.360°E using the TEC values obtained by the Global Ionosphere Models (GIM) created by IONOLAB-TEC and CODE. In order to see whether the ionospheric changes obtained by the study in question were caused by the earthquake or not, the ionospheric conditions were studied by utilizing indices providing information on solar and geomagnetic activities (F10.7cm, Kp, Dst). As a result of the statistical test on the TEC values obtained from the both models, positive and negative anomalies were obtained for the times before, on the day of and after the earthquake, and the reasons for these anomalies are discussed in detail in the last section of the study. As the ionospheric conditions in the analyzed days were highly vibrant, it was thought that the anomalies were caused by geomagnetic effects, solar activity and the earthquake. The authors believe that interdisciplinary studies are needed to distinguish the earthquake-related part of the anomalies in question.

Download & links
  • Notice on retraction

    The requested manuscript was not accepted for publication in Annales Geophysicae and was retracted upon request of the authors.

  • Discussion paper (2084 KB)
Selcuk Peker et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Selcuk Peker et al.
Selcuk Peker et al.
Viewed
Total article views: 362 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
271 69 22 362 11 19
  • HTML: 271
  • PDF: 69
  • XML: 22
  • Total: 362
  • BibTeX: 11
  • EndNote: 19
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Feb 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 Feb 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 362 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 360 with geography defined and 2 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited
Saved
No saved metrics found.
Discussed
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 17 Sep 2018
Publications Copernicus
Download
Notice on retraction

The requested manuscript was not accepted for publication in Annales Geophysicae and was retracted upon request of the authors.

Citation
Share