Journal cover Journal topic
Annales Geophysicae An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 1.621 IF 1.621
  • IF 5-year value: 1.614 IF 5-year 1.614
  • CiteScore value: 1.61 CiteScore 1.61
  • SNIP value: 0.900 SNIP 0.900
  • SJR value: 0.910 SJR 0.910
  • IPP value: 1.58 IPP 1.58
  • h5-index value: 24 h5-index 24
  • Scimago H index value: 80 Scimago H index 80
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2018-105
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2018-105
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Regular paper 24 Sep 2018

Regular paper | 24 Sep 2018

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. A revision of the manuscript is under review for the journal Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO).

Monitoring potential ionospheric changes caused by Van earthquake (Mw 7.2)

Samed Inyurt1, Selcuk Peker2, and Cetin Mekik1 Samed Inyurt et al.
  • 1Bulent Ecevit University, Geomatics Engineering Department, Zonguldak
  • 2General Command of Mapping, Ankara, Turkey

Abstract. Many scientists from different disciplines have studied earthquakes for many years. As a result of these studies, it has been proposed that some changes take place in the ionosphere layer before, during or after earthquakes, and the ionosphere should be monitored in earthquake prediction studies. This study investigates the changes in the ionosphere created by the earthquake with magnitude of Mw=7.2 in the northwest of the Lake Erçek which is located to the north of the province of Van in Turkey on 23 October 2011 and at 1.41pm local time (−3UT) with the epicenter of 38.75°N, 43.36°E using the TEC values obtained by the Global Ionosphere Models (GIM) created by IONOLAB-TEC and CODE. In order to see whether the ionospheric changes obtained by the study in question were caused by the earthquake or not, the ionospheric conditions were studied by utilizing indices providing information on solar and geomagnetic activities (F10.7cm, Kp, Dst).

One of the results of the statistical test on the TEC values obtained from the both models, positive and negative anomalies were obtained for the times before, on the day of and after the earthquake, and the reasons for these anomalies are discussed in detail in the last section of the study. As the ionospheric conditions in the analyzed days were highly variable, it was thought that the anomalies were caused by geomagnetic effects, solar activity and the earthquake.

Samed Inyurt et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: final response (author comments only)
Status: final response (author comments only)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Login for Authors/Topical Editors] [Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Samed Inyurt et al.
Samed Inyurt et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 443 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
384 54 5 443 7 3
  • HTML: 384
  • PDF: 54
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 443
  • BibTeX: 7
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Sep 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Sep 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 442 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 441 with geography defined and 1 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 13 Dec 2018
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Share